THE COMMON GOOD AND RULE OF LAW
THE COMMON GOOD
AND RULE OF LAW
The Catholic Church teaches that
“It is the role of the state to defend and promote the common good of civil
society.” (I rely in this article on
teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1897-1917.) There are three necessary elements which must
exist for the promotion of the common good: 1 – Respect for the fundamental, inalienable
rights of human persons; 2 – Access to culture and what is needed for social
well-being (i.e., food, clothing, education, the right to establish a family,
etc.); 3 – Peace and security.
The authority of the state exists to
promote the common good. It is necessary
because of the nature of human beings, who cannot create a society without
it. A society falls into chaos when there
is no legitimate authority to which the people owe respect and obedience. This authority must be rightly constituted
and use morally licit means to enforce just laws and ordinances. In the organization of powers, “It is
preferable that each power be balanced by other powers and by other spheres of
responsibility which keep it within proper bounds.” Moreover, the principle of subsidiarity
should be observed, so that what can be done better or equally well at the
local level should not be done at a higher level (i.e., the FBI should not be writing
traffic tickets).
In my opinion the failure of authorities
to resist the looting, burning and violence of protestors in the summer of 2020
was a moral failure and misuse of power since those who were entrusted with it did
not do all they could to protect lives and property. The failure by authority to enforce laws
which exist to preserve peace and order is an abuse of power. I also believe that authorities are failing
in their responsibility when they allow illegal protests in front of the homes
of judges, as is happening to some Supreme Court justices. It threatens the rule of law. The laws to prevent such protests exist to
protect the independence and integrity of the judiciary. The decisions of judges should be based on
their reading of the law and not on fear of harm to themselves or their loved
ones and property. Such threats should
not be tolerated any more than the payment of bribes.
Great harm is caused when laws to
protect the peace and to secure human life and property are not enforced. I witnessed its consequences when I was a
pastor in what were called “the badlands” of West Kensington. Criminals with a long history of arrests and
convictions were continually let out on the street where they returned to their
crimes and created new victims and abused their old ones. This continues to happen today in the United
States and contributes to an environment of crime and violence in inner city
neighborhoods. For the sake of the
common good, for the innocent residents, and even for guilty perpetrators, laws
need to be enforced, and there must be punishment imposed on those who break
them. An example of how the dereliction
of authority hurts even perpetrators was brought to my attention in a
conversation with the then-police captain of the Twenty-Fifth Precinct in the
case of a young man who had just been gunned down in the neighborhood. He had a long history of arrests on his
record and he should have been in jail.
The captain sadly noted that he would be alive if he had been serving
time in prison. Maybe with enforced
confinement, he might have participated in programs that would have given him
the skills and motivation to change.
The common good requires laws to be
enforced with a view to justice and fairness.
Enforcement should not be too lenient nor too harsh. Our system recognizes this by granting
authorities a certain amount of flexibility.
However, their decisions should always seek to promote respect for the
law, the security of citizens, the protection of public and private property, justice
for victim(s), and when possible, a chance for the reform of the offender. In our fallen world the ideal is not always
achievable, but for the sake of the common good the three principles set forth
in Catholic social teaching should inform the creation of civil laws and their
enforcement. Faith is not required for
these principles to be recognized as reasonable and necessary. The public should demand it. Humans can flourish only when they live in an
environment where there is a stable, secure, and just public order.
Comments
Post a Comment