IS THERE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO BE VACCINATED? SHOULD IT BE MANDATED?
IS THERE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO BE VACCINATED? SHOULD IT BE MANDATED?
The
great majority of scientists and physicians recommend one of the approved COVID-19
vaccines for most adults. The consensus
of medical science, it seems to me, should be the first place to start when
considering whether-or-not to be vaccinated.
Getting our information from reputable sources, which have passed peer
review by independent experts, will allow us to consider the advantages and
risks of being vaccinated. But neither
the medical experts, nor the head of the CDC, nor any politician or talking
head, has the competency to decide what is morally obligatory.
The Church
is our teacher in faith and morals and has the competency to determine whether
a particular treatment or procedure is morally acceptable. So that the faithful are not led astray, the
Church has declared some procedures to be impermissible, no matter what the
circumstances. For example, organ
harvesting, physician-assisted suicide, and direct sterilization. In most cases, however, the rightness or
wrongness of a particular medical procedure or treatment needs to be discerned
in context. What is the purpose of it? What are the potential benefits and harms to
the patient? Is it necessary or
elective? Are the costs overly burdensome? What will be the permanent effects? How will this affect the patient’s ability to
fulfill his or her responsibilities towards others? Any moral evaluation needs to consider these questions. But the final decision about a treatment or
procedure, by its nature, will be subjective since it will be made by the
patient. And if the patient rejects it,
it would be immoral to impose it on him or her.
Catholics
are obligated to always respect the integrity of their body and to promote its
well-being. It is immoral to neglect or mistreat
the body or permanently impede a natural bodily function without a grave reason. In most circumstances we are obliged by
natural and divine law to accept ordinary care and treatment. An excellent definition of ordinary means is
provided by Jesuit Father Gerard Kelly: “Ordinary
means are all medicines, treatments and operations which offer a
reasonable hope of benefit and which can be obtained and used without excessive
expense, pain or other inconvenience.” If
we accept the judgment of the medical community that the various COVID-19
vaccines are effective, with no significant side effects, then we accept that
they fall within the category of ordinary means. Does that mean there is a moral obligation to
be vaccinated? No.
I do
not believe that being vaccinated is a moral necessity. A vaccine is a preventative measure; it is
not a treatment for disease. Once a
person is infected, he or she is morally obligated to use ordinary means to
fight the virus and survive. People
cannot be obligated, however, to take every possible measure to prevent harm to
themselves or others. The possibility
that a vaccine could prevent infection or the passing on of a virus to another
person does not, of itself, oblige one to get it. Otherwise, we would be morally obligated to
get the flu shot every year. Nevertheless,
the possible good that it might do for society should be considered. “Receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines ought to be
understood as an act of charity toward the other members of our community. In this way, being vaccinated safely against
COVID-19 should be considered an act of love of our neighbor and part of our
moral responsibility for the common good” (statement by U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops). Many healthy
people who have little to fear from the virus have chosen to be vaccinated not
to protect themselves but to protect others.
In
facing a difficult medical decision Catholics should get advice from their physician,
learn all the facts they can, speak to loved ones about it, and if they have a
concern about its moral dimension, they should consult their priest, deacon, or
a lay person with competence in Catholic moral theology. Finally, a patient must make a prudential
judgment that accords with his or her conscience. This decision should be respected. For this reason, I believe that it would constitute
a violation of human rights if the government were to mandate the vaccine. As for me, I chose to be vaccinated so that I would not be
inhibited from visiting the sick. But I
will always defend the right of people to make their own prudential health care
decisions without coercion, even during a pandemic.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree and appreciate the narrative as tive
ReplyDeleteI agree and appreciate the narrative as tive
ReplyDelete